Problem
Storm-driven businesses lose time when weather events, territory relevance, and follow-up timing are all checked manually across maps, forecasts, and internal notes.
R&D case study
Weather-triggered signal and routing system in active development to turn storm activity into usable operational input for StormIQ.
At a glance
Delivery stage
R&D
Current state
Active Build
My role
Sole architect and engineer building the system foundation
In-progress proof surface
This case study is structured to accept real walkthroughs, diagrams, and operational artifacts later. Until those exist, the page stays text-led and explicit about what is still in progress.
System Walkthrough (planned)
A walkthrough is being prepared once the first usable end-to-end signal path is stable enough to show without hand-waving.
Architecture / Flow
The current architecture direction is already clear even though the full artifact set is not published yet.
Storm-driven businesses lose time when weather events, territory relevance, and follow-up timing are all checked manually across maps, forecasts, and internal notes.
WeatherForge is being built as the event-signal layer that will feed StormIQ. The current direction centers on ingesting weather and geography signals, normalizing them into reviewable events, and handing those events to downstream qualification and routing workflows instead of asking operators to monitor conditions by hand.
System boundaries are defined for signal ingestion, normalization, territory relevance, and downstream routing; implementation is in progress
This section shows the operational logic behind the build, not just the user-facing surface.
Core constraint
Signal quality: raw weather activity is noisy, so the system has to separate interesting operational events from background data before anything gets routed forward
This page separates what is already visible from what is still being prepared, so the proof layer can grow without pretending unfinished artifacts already exist.
Real artifacts stay visible. Missing artifacts are labeled directly so this page stays honest and ready for stronger proof later.
A walkthrough is being prepared once the first usable end-to-end signal path is stable enough to show without hand-waving.
The current architecture direction is already clear even though the full artifact set is not published yet.
The work is being shaped around reviewable operational surfaces rather than a hidden model-only flow.
The page is ready for real artifacts, but they are not being claimed before they exist.
More work at a similar delivery stage.
Proof surface in progress
Architecture / Flow
The architecture direction is already concrete: stateful orchestration, controlled branches, and explicit review seams.
Workflow orchestration layer in active development for managing state, decision flow, and human review inside StormIQ.
My Role
Sole architect and engineer building the orchestration layer
Outcome
Execution model is defined for graph-driven workflow state, validation boundaries, and human review seams; implementation is in progress

Broader lead-automation direction being built on top of WeatherForge and DGM rather than treated as a finished standalone system.
My Role
Sole architect defining the system direction and building the foundation layers
Outcome
StormIQ is now framed as a serious in-progress program direction, with WeatherForge and DGM acting as the concrete systems under active development